Facts about S. 1963 – Caregiver and Veterans Omnibus Health Services Act
1. Dr. Coburn is NOT opposing the veterans caregiver bill, he merely wants to debate and amend the legislation to improve it.
2. The veteran caregiver bill currently discriminates against Vietnam veterans, Gulf War I veterans, and World War II veterans.
3. The veteran caregiver bill duplicates an existing program that has been providing benefits for decades to veterans to take care of themselves in their homes rather than nursing homes or hospitals.
4. Unlike the veteran caregiver bill, Dr. Coburn’s amendment increases benefits for all veterans, and reduces wasteful spending in order to guarantee that veterans today and in the future will receive the benefits they have earned, including these new caregiver benefits.
Commerce, Justice & Science Appropriations Bill Amendments and Background
Debt of the Next Generation
Total Spending
$67.49 billion
This is a $7.59 billion (12.68%) increase over the FY 2009 regular order appropriations level of $59.89 billion.
The FY 2009 level of $59.89 billion was a 15.5% increase over the FY 2008 level of $51.8 billion
In FY 2009, programs under the CJS bill received $16.2 billion in Stimulus funding.
Department of Commerce
The bill provides $14.04 billion for the Department of Commerce. This is a 51.6% increase over the FY 2009 level of $9.26 billion. A large part of this increase is because the Census receives a $4.2 billion (134%) increase.
If you assume level funding for the Census (obviously not the case, but just if you assume that), the rest of the Department of Commerce receives a 6.4% increase over FY 2009. In FY 2009, Commerce also received $7.9 billion in Stimulus/emergency funding. Given that in FY 2009, the Department received $9.26 billion as its annual appropriation, and this year that figure is $14.04 billion, they have rolled a large part of the “one-time” Stimulus funding into the baseline for the Department.
Department of Justice The bill provides $27.38 billion for the Department of Justice, which is $1.29 billion more than the FY 2009 enacted level (an increase of 4.98 percent). In FY 2009, DoJ also received $4.2 billion in Stimulus/emergency funding.
Science Funding(NSF, NSAS, Office of Science and Technology)
Total science funding in the bill is $25.6 billion. This is up $1.33 billion (5.5%) over last year. In FY 2009, these science programs also received an additional $4 billion in Stimulus/supplemental funding.
Earmarks
561 earmarks costing $370.8 million.
Coburn Amendments:
Amendment: 2631: Prohibit the National Science Foundation from wasting federal research funding on political science projects.
The National Science Foundation (which receives a 6.6% increase in this bill over last year) spent $91.3 million over the last 10 years on political “science.” The purpose of this amendment is not to restrict science, but rather to better focus scarce basic research dollars on the important scientific endeavors that can expand our knowledge of true science and yield breakthroughs and discoveries that can improve the human condition.
Click here for additional background.
Amendment 2632: To make all reports authorized in the bill public.
This amendment would require all reports authorized by this appropriations bill to be publicized on the Website of the federal agency who is either conducting the report or being reviewed in the report. The only exceptions are for reports that contain classified or proprietary information. This amendment was unanimously adopted to the E&W, Interior, DOD, and T-HUD appropriations bills and was developed with the help of the appropriations committee. Click here for additional background.
Amendment 2667: Prioritizing excess construction funds for the Inspector General’s Office.
While the House version of the CJS appropriations bill includes the same amount as last year for the renovation of the Herbert C. Hoover Department of Commerce building (HCHB) - $5 million – the Senate and the Administration have recommended a 350 percent increase ($17.5 million increase) in spending in a down economy for a variety of improvements, including historic restoration and new bicycle racks. This amendment would shift $5 million in funding from the Hoover Department of Commerce building to the Inspector General’s office of the Commerce to help them address what the Senate Committee referred to as “a culture within many agencies [funded in CJS] that exhibits a lack of accountability and oversight of grant funding.” Click here for additional background.
Coburn Amendments to the Defense Appropriations Bill
2010 Defense Appropriations Background:
HR 3326 appropriates $497.6 billion for Department of Defense (DoD) base budget and $128.2 billion for war costs. Combined, the bill appropriates $625.8 billion, which is $3.9 billion below the President’s request. This amount represents half of all discretionary government spending for FY2010 ($1.25 trillion). The bill includes 778 earmarkscosting $2.65 billion.
Dr. Coburn's Amendments:
Amendment number 2569 — To restore $294 million in operations and maintenance funding to members of the Armed Forces to prepare for and conduct combat operations by accounting for the August 2009 Congressional Budget Office economic assumptions and reducing funding for low-priority research and development earmarks. Click here for additional background.
Operation and Maintenance funds are directly related to military readiness because it provides funds for training troops for combat and for maintaining tanks, airplanes, ships, and related equipment such as the purchase of spare parts. O&M accounts also fund a wide range of activities such as civilian personnel management and payments, transportation expenses, health care, and child care. President Obama requested $156.4 billion in operation and maintenance funds for FY2010. However, the Senate Appropriations Committee cut $2.4 billion from this request for operations and maintenance in order to fund other priorities such as earmarks. $294 million of this cut was due to “revised economic assumptions” based on out-of-date inflation information. Operations and Maintenance appropriations are critically important as they are the only appropriated funds that unit commanders (battalion and squadron commanders, ship captains, etc) can spend easily. Other funds such as military personnel, procurement, research and development, and military construction accounts are spent at the highest levels of the military command leadership.
This amendment restores $294 million to Operations and Maintenance funding accounts by striking the part of Section 8091 that the bill reduces operations and maintenance funding.
The amendment is offset by reducing overall spending in Research, Development, Test and Evaluation funding by the same amount ($294 million). Research and development accounts are the source for the majority of earmarks in the Department of Defense appropriations bill. Out of 778 earmarks, 588 are research and development earmarks. Out of $2.6 billion in earmarks, $1.9 billion is for research and development earmarks.
Amendment number 2566 — To restore over $165 million in operations and maintenance funding to members of the Armed Forces to prepare for and conduct combat operations by prohibiting funding of earmarks from operations and maintenance accounts. Click here for additional background.
Operation and Maintenance funds are directly related to military readiness because it provides funds for training troops for combat and for maintaining tanks, airplanes, ships, and related equipment such as the purchase of spare parts. O&M accounts also fund a wide range of activities such as civilian personnel management and payments, transportation expenses, health care, and child care. President Obama requested $156.4 billion in operation and maintenance funds for FY2010. However, the Senate Appropriations Committee earmarked over $165 million from this request for operations and maintenance in order to fund earmarks. This amendment restores $165 million to Operations and Maintenance funding accounts by prohibiting spending on the congressionally directed spending items from Title II (Operation and Maintenance).
Amendment 2563— To require all reports authorized in this bill be publicized and accessible to the public once completed
This amendment requires that all reports required to be submitted by a federal agency within this act be posted on the public Website of that agency for all Americans and Members of Congress to see. The only exception to this is for reports that contain classified or proprietary information. This amendment was unanimously adopted as an amendment to the Energy and Water Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2010 (H.R. 3183), the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2010 (H.R. 3288) and the Interior Appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2010 (H.R. 2996). By passing this amendment to the Department of Defense appropriations bill, Congress will increase transparency of the both the legislative and administrative process and give Americans the opportunity to be more involved in holding their elected officials accountable. Click here for additional background.
Amendment 2565 — To require the National Guard and Reserve Component to submit their modernization priorities to the entire Congress, and seek input from Secretary of Defense Gates
The Appropriations committee recommends an addition of $1.5 billion for procurement of National Guard and Reserve Equipment. This is $1.5 billion above the amounts already appropriated for procurement of weapon systems for all the military departments ($108 billion) included in the President's Budget request. The National Guard is not required by the bill to show their list of funding priorities to the Secretary of Defense. This amendment would require that the National Guard and Reserve component commanders submit their modernization priority lists to Secretary Gates for review. Secretary Gates will note the report with approval or disapproval before it is sent to the entire Congress. This will ensure increased transparency of the additional $1.5 billion provided to the National Guard in this legislation. Click here for additional background.